3 Comments

Update: Dublin Pride / Northwest Pride

A member of the Dublin Pride committee has contacted EILE Magazine in relation to the recent ‘open letter’ by Northwest LGBT Pride.

Dublin Pride clarified that they had, in fact, been in contact with Northwest Pride before the publishing of the open letter. Dublin Pride had given a lengthy reply to Northwest Pride in order to try and resolve this situation before the actual festival began, and could not understand why Northwest Pride subsequently published the open letter on their website, with no mention of Dublin Pride’s reply.

Dublin Pride has also stated that the terms and conditions referred to in Northwest Pride’s open letter have been in place for a number of years, and therefore have never stopped any group from participating, nor curtailed freedom of expression.

Northwest Pride, which serves counties Sligo, Leitrim and Donegal, voiced their concerns about the terms and conditions regarding Dublin Pride’s parade entry in the open letter, posted on Saturday, June 22. Yet Dublin Pride also informed us that the Northwest Pride committee had already e-mailed this letter to Dublin Pride privately on Tuesday, June 18

Dublin Pride gave a lengthy and detailed reply to Northwest Pride on the morning of Friday, June 21, but received no word back on this matter. Instead, it appears that Northwest LGBT Pride decided to make the issue public by turning their initial letter into an ‘Open Letter’ and posting it on their website’s blog on Saturday afternoon, June 22. Dublin Pride’s response was not referred to at all in the blogpost, giving the impression that Saturday’s open letter was the first action taken by Northwest Pride.

Despite the misunderstanding between Northwest Pride and Dublin Pride, Dublin Pride has stated that Northwest Pride is “very welcome” to participate in the future. Dublin Pride’s response can be read in full here, while Northwest Pride’s Open Letter (and subsequent comments by both groups) can be read here.

About EILE Magazine

The new LGBT magazine; available online, for download and on podcast. It's time for another view.

3 comments on “Update: Dublin Pride / Northwest Pride

  1. Dear Eile & Eile readers,

    As Dublin Pride have stated we did in fact receive a reply from the board before publishing our letter online. In regards to the line in this article: “Dublin Pride had given a lengthy reply to Northwest Pride in order to try and resolve this situation before the actual festival began, and could not understand why Northwest Pride subsequently published the open letter on their website, with no mention of Dublin Pride’s reply.” Northwest LGBT Pride would like to point out the fact that on the ‘open letter’ blog post, within minutes of the letter being posted Dublin Pride reiterated their defending of the registration form and the concerns we raised in the letter. Within minutes of Dublin’s Pride comment on the blog post NWPride responded acknowledging their response and once again ensuring that the board members of Dublin Pride knew that our concerns where simply voiced as a community pride, in which we felt Dublin Pride has lost touch with… “On our behalf, this action does not come with the intent that other groups should “boycott” Dublin Pride, as some may interpret.”

    The action of publishing our open letter on our blog, was to ensure that community groups and other individuals who had been denied their voice at Dublin Pride, do in fact has the right to do so, and have support from each other.

    Full blog post and comments tread can be found here: http://northwestprideireland.com/blog/open-letter-to-dublin-pride/

  2. “Northwest LGBT Pride would like to point out the fact that on the ‘open letter’ blog post, within minutes of the letter being posted Dublin Pride reiterated their defending of the registration form and the concerns we raised in the letter. Within minutes of Dublin’s Pride comment on the blog post NWPride responded . ”

    Can you clarify how, if Dublin Pride responded within minutes of your intial posting does their reply have a date stamp of the following day and your response to them was actually (according to your blog’s date stamp) 2.5 hours later, not the few minutes you are stating as a “fact”

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: