Theatre Review: The Exorcist – Gaiety Theatre Dublin

The Exorcist

The Gaiety Theatre, Sth King Street, Dublin 2

Runs until November 2nd – Tickets from €21

Shows 7.30pm October 31

Shows at 5pm and 8.30pm November 2nd

The word iconic is bandied about a lot, but it is a fitting term to describe William Friedkin’s 1973 horror movie, The Exorcist, adapted from the novel of the same name by William Peter Blatty. It managed to shock and enthral audiences in equal measure, and was considered so scandalous that it was actually banned in Ireland for over 25 years (if you’ve seen it you can appreciate why it wouldn’t get past the censors in Catholic Ireland).

I imagine most people know the story at this stage. A young girl named Regan begins acting out of character, and when regular doctors can’t get to the bottom of her condition, her movie-star mother, Chris, turns to the church for help, believing that something sinister is going on.

Given that the nature of the tale it is extremely graphic, both the book and the film contain highly sexualised and disturbing scenes. I must admit I was uncertain as to how this would translate to the live version, without the benefits of movie trickery, or the reader’s imagination.

It starts off promisingly enough, as the theatre suddenly plunges into darkness, which elicited screams from many attendees. However, once the story begins, it feels rather rushed. We get barely any character development, before Reagan (played here by Eliza Capel in her professional stage debut) is in the throes of the demon.

Her distraught mother, Chris (Sophie Ward) has little to do but utter “Oh My God”, and although we dip in and out of the story of Father Damien (Call The Midwife’s Ben Caplan) who will eventually agree to perform an exorcism on Regan, it feels more like telegraphing rather than any real insight into the person.

Top-billed Paul Nicholas (whom you’ll remember from Just Good Friends) plays Father Merrin, a seasoned exorcist, who is recruited by Father Damien, when he realises that this demon is too strong for him to deal with alone. However, if you are fan of his, take note that he is only on stage for about 20 minutes, and again you don’t ever feel like you get to know his character, or what drives him..

Although all the cast really do try, the script is on the hokey side. It feels rather stilted, and never really develops a flow. Also, many of the American accents are rather grating after a while. Indeed, the most interesting, and well-rounded character is the demon, who is voiced by none other than Sir Ian McKellan, whose dulcet tones will send a shiver down your spine, as the demons intentions become more and more apparent.

The first half clocks in at around 55 minutes, and the second at around 50, which I found surprising. It felt like an extremely short first half, and I’m not sure an interval was well advised, as the play did lose momentum. Also I was surprised at where they broke, as the famous moment where Father Merrin arrives at the house (the image which graces the movie poster and book cover) seemed to be a more appropriate point to drop the curtain, as it would leave the audience with a sense of anticipation.

In the absence of special effects, they rely heavily on lighting, and, be warned, this is extremely heavy on the strobe lights. So much so that it becomes somewhat tedious, and almost headache-inducing. At one point I felt the lights were doing more acting than the cast.

They do attempt many of the film’s famous scenes. We are treated to Regan’s head rotating, and this draws applause from the impressed audience. They also attempt to portray the projectile vomiting that features so heavily in the flick, but alas, it is not as effective here. Unfortunately, one of the most shocking lines, which has taken on a life of its own (it involves what Father Damien’s mother is doing in hell – I won’t write it here lest it distress some readers who aren’t familiar with it) is somewhat watered down here, and, if you’ve seen the movie and are expecting it, it really puts a damper on that scene. I was surprised by this, as it’s not as if they shy away from the crude language so prevalent in this work.

This lacks the shock-factor and chills that you get from the movie, even after several watches. I felt that it didn’t push the material as far as it could, and it was trying to reign itself in, which was to its own detriment. Also, if you are not familiar with the characters’ stories from the book or the film, you will find what is portrayed here very one-dimensional. I don’t think I would have cared very much about any of them, without the added benefit of knowing the background.

For the Halloween season that’s in it, this is good fun, with a few forced jump-out-of-your-seat moments thrown in. However, if you are expecting to be properly scared and shocked, it won’t tick your boxes.

Maybe for audiences it takes more to evoke a reaction nowadays. However 45 years on, the film can still reduce people to a quivering wreck, so it is disappointing that the stage show couldn’t at least elicit some strong feelings.

About EILE Magazine

The new LGBT magazine; available online, for download and on podcast. It's time for another view.
%d bloggers like this: